The Salesperson Nobody Asked About — Who Everyone Remembered

The Salesperson Nobody Asked About — Who Everyone Remembered

This post is an excerpt taken from the upcoming book The Hidden Buyer Journey, to read more click here.

Here is a question worth sitting with: if a researcher called your customers tomorrow and asked them about their buying experience, would they mention you by name?

Not your company. Not your product.

You, specifically. By name.

For most sales professionals, the honest answer is probably no. And that’s not an indictment of their effort or their intentions. It’s a reflection of how B2B selling has been structured for the past two decades — around process, pipeline stages, and quarterly targets rather than around the human being on the other side of the deal.

Ben is the exception that proves the rule.

We Weren’t Looking for Ben

We didn’t go looking for Ben. We were conducting customer research for a private equity firm that had acquired several companies and was evaluating how to consolidate their brands. The goal was straightforward: interview existing customers, understand the strengths and weaknesses of the brand, and surface the insights that would inform the go-forward strategy.

We interviewed dozens of customers across multiple acquired companies. We were asking about brand perception, buying experience, product satisfaction — the usual territory. And then something unusual started happening.

A name kept coming up.

Not a product name. Not a company name. A person’s name. Ben.

What made this remarkable wasn’t just that customers remembered him. It was that they remembered him across companies he had never officially sold to. Ben sold products across three of the acquired businesses. But his name surfaced in interviews with customers of all of them — including ones where he had no formal relationship, no account ownership, no territory.

In years of conducting this kind of research, we had never seen anything like it.

What Ben Actually Did

When we dug into why customers kept mentioning Ben, the picture that emerged wasn’t what you might expect. Nobody talked about his pitch. Nobody mentioned his product knowledge in the traditional sense. Nobody brought up his closing technique or his follow-up cadence.

What they talked about was what Ben did for them.

The product team at one company described how Ben had worked directly with their engineering team during product design — showing up not as a vendor trying to protect a sale, but as someone genuinely invested in making sure they had the right components for what they were building. That’s not in anyone’s job description. Ben just did it.

The procurement team at another company explained how Ben had somehow created a consolidated invoice that allowed them to manage purchasing across three separate business units — something the selling company didn’t actually offer as a service. To this day, we’re not entirely sure how he pulled it off. But he did.

And a third company’s buying team simply said: “Ben actually answers his phone.”

That last one landed hardest. In a world of automated sequences, CRM-generated follow-up tasks, and carefully managed response windows, the fact that a human being picked up the phone when you called was memorable enough to mention unprompted in a research interview.

What Ben Was Actually Selling

Here’s the thing about Ben that the traditional sales framework completely misses: he wasn’t selling products. He was selling something far more valuable and far more difficult to replicate.

He was selling himself as the most reliable, knowledgeable, responsive partner his customers had.

The consolidated invoice nobody asked for. The engineering conversations nobody else was having. The phone that actually got answered. None of that appeared in a product brochure. None of it showed up in a CRM field. None of it would have been captured by any intent signal or engagement metric in any marketing platform.

All of it was what kept his name coming up in interview after interview, across companies he’d never even officially sold to.

Ben had figured out — instinctively, without being taught it — that his job wasn’t to sell. His job was to make it easier for people to buy. And in doing so, he had built something that no competitor could undercut on price, no algorithm could replicate at scale, and no automation could replace: genuine trust.

What the Research Tells Us

Ben’s story isn’t just a feel-good anecdote about a talented rep. It’s evidence of something the research confirmed repeatedly across thousands of buyers in fifteen industries.

When customers are asked what actually drove their purchase decision, the top three answers — product quality, usability, and value — are things they can only experience after they’ve already bought. Which means during the sales process itself, they’re not evaluating the product. They’re evaluating something else entirely.

They’re evaluating Promise. Credibility. Trust. And whether the business argument being made feels honest rather than optimistic.

None of those are rational calculations. All of them are emotional judgments about the person in front of them. A buyer doesn’t calculate trust. They feel it. They don’t measure credibility against a rubric. They sense it in how a rep shows up, how much they know, how well they listen.

Ben understood this without being taught it. He wasn’t operating in a machine-to-human world, sending triggered sequences to a list. He wasn’t in a human-to-machine world, entering data and working algorithm-generated queues. He was doing something far simpler and far more powerful.

He was being human, to another human.

The Question Worth Asking

The B2B industry has spent the better part of two decades building systems designed to scale the sales process — to remove the inefficiency, the unpredictability, the human variability from the equation. And those systems have produced exactly what you’d expect: a selling environment where 61% of buyers say they’d prefer a rep-free experience entirely.

Ben is the argument against that trajectory. Not because he was operating without technology or process. But because he never let the technology or process become the point. The point was always the person on the other side of the conversation.

In our research, the most effective predictor of whether a deal closes isn’t the strength of the product, the competitiveness of the pricing, or the sophistication of the marketing automation. It’s whether the buyer trusts the person making the promise.

Ben built that trust across three companies, in an organization he only officially worked for one of, with customers who remembered his name years later in a research interview nobody told them was coming.

That’s not a sales technique. That’s a human one. And in a world that is rapidly automating everything else, it turns out to be the most competitive advantage of all.

LinkedIn Wants to Be the TikTok of Business: Will it Work?

LinkedIn Wants to Be the TikTok of Business: Will it Work?

Late last year LinkedIn changed its algorithm, signaling a pivot in its business strategy and taking a dramatic shift. The question is, why?

Has LinkedIn come to the realization that other social platforms are increasingly coming after business (especially small business) or is it their advertising model they covet?

The truth is, LinkedIn needs growth. Revenue growth has slowed to 9% in 2023 and 2024, driven mostly by premium subscription and talent solutions.

And new growth looks like advertising, and lots of it. The old free “networking” platform is quickly transitioning to becoming an ad platform.

The Change

Many users of the platform will tell you they saw a dramatic decrease in their engagement metrics at the end of last year. According to Richard van der Blom and Just Connecting’s Algorithm Insights Report 2025, overall organic reach has declined 50% over the last year in hope of connecting content with the right audience…quality over quantity.

LinkedIn wants to be TikTok graph

LinkedIn’s AI-driven ranking systems now resemble those of platforms like Instagram and TikTok, meaning you are more likely to see content coming from less creators, and more from creators you engage and/or connect with. Compared to the past which was more balanced towards professional relevance and interest.

Just as the other platforms mentioned have created content “rabbit holes” to dive into, those same content holes are being created in a quest to drive deeper engagement. Where it was once believed that LinkedIn favored organic content creators, it’s now fully on the side of the content consumers.  For businesses, this change (unless you have a broad following) means that little of the content that you are sharing on your corporate page will make it through to your audiences organically.  In fact, according to a report, organic corporate page content showing in a LI feed has now fallen to 2% in 2024.

The Big Push for Video

What is increasing is video. Lots of it. The use of video increased by 69% in the past year according to the Algorithm report and Daniel Shapero, LinkedIn’s COO who stated that viewer time has increased by 36% year-over-year.

To continue the push to video, LinkedIn has now built a staple of 50+ B2B influencers to promote it. They’ve signed business partnerships with well-known content creators, like Steven Bartlett (The Diary of a CEO), Guy Raz (How I Built This), and Allie K. Miller (AI Business), to make more video content for the platform. Anyone want to guess why?

If you guessed ‘to sell more advertising’, you’re correct. Mr. Shapero also stated that advertising revenues saw significant growth in the quarter, and they see video as a great way to extend business reach.

What Does it Mean for Business and Paid Social?

The first question…is LinkedIn an important media channel for your business? If so, then the second question is, what is the goal? What is your expectation – do you see it as an awareness or demand generation channel?

If it is the latter, you may find the new direction frustrating. LinkedIn pushes video mostly for reach and impressions. And, as I mentioned in my last post, LinkedIn posts and promotions are very difficult to connect to business impact metrics. You may be better off investing in LinkedIn’s Sales Navigator.

If the goal is awareness, then you are in luck! Here’s what you need to do in order to align with the new direction.

  • Ramp up video – Identify thought leaders who are camera ready to use for short form videos. Candidates should be subject matter leaders and not salespeople.
  •  Videos should be vertical in format and under 1 min in run time.
  • Shift budget from promoting posts on your LinkedIn corporate page to higher performing thought leadership ads sponsoring videos.
  • Posting video should be done by the person featured and reshared by the corporate page…and hopefully, employees within your organization.
  • Focus on storytelling. Personal stories perform best. Go easy on the selling.
  • Link your metrics to track performance from impressions to form fill or website visit.

Will it Work?

LinkedIn says that the changes have been made in an effort to bring more of the content consumers want by mining engagement data. By doing this, it is restricting the organic reach of content creators. And that organic reach drove results, according to The Social Shepherd, 77% of B2B marketers said that organic content and engagement produced the best results.

Now those creators will be ones who will be buying the ads. The question is, can they create the quality and style of content that will fit the new advertising vehicles, like Thought Leadership ads.

Will LinkedIn influencers be effective? If you don’t have the inhouse talent to build a following you may consider “renting” one. But, a business audience is very different from a consumer audience. Will LinkedIn influencers be creditable enough to move an audience to take action?

All good questions that we’ll watch play out over time. In the short-term ad revenue will grow, but in the long run, will it adversely impact user experience? One thing is certain, you will see more sponsored content, especially from LinkedIn, on your feed.

I don’t knock LinkedIn for making the pivot. TikTok owns small business retail and Instagram is coming for corporations. Business buyers are consumers and have been programmed to prefer video on social feeds.

Users of “free” platforms also get that is a price to pay for usage, but will this pivot drive users to spend less time on it. Currently, 16% of users check in daily for an average of 1 minute and 17 seconds, according to The Social Shepherd.

Let’s also keep in mind that the platform was built and grew by catering to recruiters and job seekers. Can it balance the need for revenue growth while staying true to its original charter?

It’s a big bet and only time will tell. TikTok goes the clock…

Are You About to Lose Your Customer? Warning Signs You Can’t Ignore

Are You About to Lose Your Customer? Warning Signs You Can’t Ignore

In today’s economic climate, losing a customer isn’t just disappointing—it’s potentially devastating. Yet many businesses miss the early warning signals until it’s too late.
I’m experiencing this firsthand with one of our vendors right now. The relationship is deteriorating, and I can see exactly where things went wrong. Don’t let this happen to your business. Here are the critical warning signs to recognize and address immediately:

1. Service Deterioration

When service quality stumbles at the start and never recovers—or worse, begins strong but steadily declines—customers notice immediately. This often stems from internal turnover or stretched resources, but regardless of the cause, clients can sense when they’re no longer a priority. Remember: consistency is as important as quality.

2. Communication Breakdown

Poor communication compounds service issues and accelerates relationship decline. Worst of all is attempting to cover problems with transparent excuses—this damages trust far more than the original issue. The solution is straightforward but crucial: honest, proactive communication can salvage even troubled relationships.

3. Eroding Trust

If your customer begins questioning your expertise or experience, you’re facing a five-alarm fire. Once trust evaporates, recovery becomes exponentially more difficult. This warning sign demands immediate intervention—schedule a candid conversation about expectations and reset the relationship before it’s unsalvageable.

4. Subpar Deliverables

Sometimes the sales team sets impossible expectations, creating a delivery gap from day one. Other times, businesses overreach beyond their core competencies. Either way, consistently disappointing deliverables will end relationships. Focus on excelling at what you do best rather than attempting to be everything to everyone.

5. The Toxic Team Member

One underperforming team member can poison an entire customer relationship. Don’t retain problematic employees simply to fill a position—they consume disproportionate management resources while actively damaging customer relationships. Make the difficult staffing decisions before they cost you valuable clients.

6. The Preemptive Reset

Sometimes the boldest move is acknowledging when you can’t meet expectations. Proactively addressing shortcomings—even suggesting a pause in the relationship—demonstrates integrity and preserves future possibilities. A temporary revenue hit is preferable to a permanently damaged reputation.

The Path Forward

Customers don’t make switching decisions lightly. When a vendor is deeply integrated into operations or fulfills a critical function, transition costs are substantial. This reality often creates a window for relationship recovery—but only if you recognize the warning signs and act decisively.

Use this opportunity to genuinely improve your service delivery. Not only might you save the relationship, but you’ll also remove the constant weight of knowing you’re underserving a client—a burden no business owner should carry.

Why B2B Marketers Get Their Signals Crossed

Why B2B Marketers Get Their Signals Crossed

As previously published on 7/11/24 in MarTech

Did you know that you have your own intent data, you don’t need to buy it. If you are executing campaigns, especially in existing accounts you have data that goes much deeper than what you could buy. 

You just know where, and how, to look for it. Once you find it you will realize that what has been sold, or said, to you about “signals” isn’t exactly true. 

As marketers, we’ve been told that there is a connection between a “signal” of a prospect seeking information with their interest in your company or product.  That a response to an offer made could imply they’re “in the market to buy”

This is how Zoominfo describes intent data based on signal strength.  

  • “Derived intent signals are a mix of first-party and third-party signals. These offer insights into behaviors that indicate interest in a company, such as ad engagement, web activity, topic engagement, and technology use.”

As a result, we have a tendency to think of this as a MQL. But this is where things break from reality. Again from ZoomInfo:

  • “Identify interest: Purchase-intent signals help identify which companies are actively researching your solution before they fill out a form on your site or engage with your sales and marketing teams.”

This is simply not true, it’s an assumption. Let me break it down, unless you understand a buyer’s personality, which would give you real insight into their behaviors and motivations, and you are able to observe this over time, you can not assume that they are “actively searching” for what you are offering because they have ‘purchase intent.” 

We have found only a small percent (5-10%) of cases where this is true, and we have evaluated engagement and intent data across 7 industries and thousands of interactions. When you look at your own data you will find the same thing. 

Given the fact that 5% of your targeted audience is in a buying cycle at any one time this would make sense. But what is more interesting is what is in the 95% of data that you aren’t analyzing or buying. 

Here’s what you need to know about to analyzing your own engagement data

First, pull data from your sales and marketing systems at the account level. We’re often so busy executing we rarely have time to look at what has happened in the past. You’ll want to pull 12 to 18 months of engagement data based on the length of the sales cycle.

Pull data on 10 accounts to start. They could be the 10 biggest or most important (based on pipeline value) accounts. Here’s what you’ll want to look for in the data. 

  • Engagement over time – this is an important metric because it’s a measure of mindshare you have with a buyer/contact. Look for how they have engaged with your outreach over the past 12 to 18 months. Is it a “burst,” for example, a C-level engages multiple times in a month or is it “consistent” – a couple of engagements over a longer period of time. 
  • Engagement time – how much time did they spend with whatever was offered. Was it millisecond or seconds?  This will help you understand their level of engagement. Are they glancing at what was sent or did they dig deeper?
  • Engagement frequency –  did they hit one thing multiple times in one day, and over a period of time? This may be an indicator of them forwarding information to others. And it gives you insight into who might be the “router” of information inside of the account. 
  • Engagement offer – what are they engaging with, e.g. what offer or outreach. Are they looking at webinar invites, new case studies, reading the newsletter, etc. Having 10 accounts will give you real insight into what content really matters. 

This insight will help you understand if the audience is interested in your brand, solution, or just what was offered. 

Most times, it will be just the offer. But that’s a great insight because it allows you to narrow down your activities to the things that really matter to your audience. What content offers really do is they open a window for a salesperson to be viewed as valuable. It doesn’t tell you if the target is in a buying window or in a certain part of the buyer’s journey, unfortunately. 

Giving the sales organization insight into how, and what, audiences are engaging with enables them to focus on starting a relationship. Through a better understanding of why people are doing what they are doing, it gets to their real motivations. The signal becomes insight. 

For example, did they look at your upcoming webinar invite or user conference?  How many times did they look at it? How many emails related to those events did they open? Did they attend the event? If they didn’t, you now know they were interested. 

This creates an opportunity for the salesperson to offer an on demand version of the webinar or maybe a free pass to next year’s event. They’re building a relationship based on interest, not jumping to selling a solution where they have shown no real interest in pursuing. 

And that is what is in your 95% of the engagement data that doesn’t get analyzed. It tells sales who to spend their time with, and how to start a relationship, that one day could become a new customer. 

Corporate Cultures

Corporate Cultures

By Scott Gillum
Estimated read time: 3 Minutes
Want to take your ICP’s to the next level? Try using personality based marketing to understand corporate cultures.

Here’s why. Above are 2 SaaS companies in the martech industry. Our client is selling to the same buyer in each company. But the company situations are vastly different.

The first company is growing aggressively and has a corporate culture that is full of “Dominate” personalities.

The second company is under attack and has lost significant revenue and market share during the last two years. The corporate culture is skeptical, given the prevalence of “Consciences” personalities.

So what does all this mean?

First, it impacts the positioning of the value of your product.

Second, it helps you identify the right set of the sales and marketing assets.

In company 1, you position the value of the offering to help scale growth.

You communicate that through case studies with ROIs. Given their “dominant” culture, they are heads down operators so use relevant case studies that align, as closely as possible, to their situation.

In company 2, you position the value of the product on what it can do to drive efficiency.

This is a company fighting for its survival. It needs ideas on how to improve operations. As a result, use cases showing potential cost savings (business cases) are most important.

And given the culture, use data and research to support the use/business cases which is essential for building credibility in selling to an organization like this.

Before you even speak to a buyer you can understand the environment in which they operate. It allows you to create a connection — optimism for company 1, empathy in company 2.

ICP’s are not just an acronym, they’re people. Decisions are influenced by emotions. Motivations cause decisions, and personality dictates both.

The more you understand this the higher the likelihood of getting engagement, interest, and a decision. It’s a 1, 2 punch.